
DOJ accuses Mississippi of discrimination over new law
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Ben Burke (Producer/Editor)
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 6% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Netus taciti condimentum class himenaeos suspendisse nostra auctor ut etiam, malesuada vestibulum suscipit proin dictumst phasellus sodales ridiculus magna euismod, feugiat potenti platea habitant ullamcorper lobortis porta augue.
- Primis proin montes nibh magna sed lorem duis phasellus massa sit blandit eget tincidunt ligula, cursus eu suspendisse nascetur sagittis netus lobortis suscipit dictum eros eleifend semper non.
- Maximus platea mi neque suscipit bibendum cubilia etiam ultrices consectetur dui, senectus cursus torquent eleifend nam nascetur cras urna pretium.
- Ipsum euismod ornare ullamcorper dictumst varius netus himenaeos eget rhoncus, consequat dis sagittis tristique semper cursus aptent velit nisl lacus, mollis posuere adipiscing elementum at dictum vestibulum potenti.
- Curabitur adipiscing mattis odio cubilia quisque nisi suspendisse iaculis mus platea, netus duis praesent mauris etiam nibh quis lorem.
- Fames quam auctor donec potenti placerat aliquam lorem varius curae viverra, vivamus egestas neque interdum nam commodo posuere lobortis inceptos.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
The Justice Department announced Wednesday, July 13, it is challenging a new Mississippi law. The department claimed the law discriminates against Black people in the capital city of Jackson.
The law creates a new court in Jackson, with prosecutors appointed by the Mississippi attorney general and a judge appointed by the Mississippi Supreme Court chief justice. It also authorizes the chief justice to appoint four other judges to work alongside the four elected circuit court judges in Hinds County, where Jackson is located.
The department argued this creates a two-tiered justice system between the judges and prosecutors that are elected, and those that would be appointed under the new law. In a statement, Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division described the law as “a crude scheme” that targets the county, which is 70% Black.
“This thinly-veiled state takeover is intended to strip power, voice and resources away from Hinds County’s predominantly-Black electorate, singling out the majority Black Hinds County for adverse treatment imposed on no other voters in the state of Mississippi,” Clarke said.
“We want to ensure that the citizens of Hinds County and Jackson, Mississippi, are treated equally in the support and operation of their criminal justice system,” U.S. Attorney Darren J. LaMarca for the Southern District of Mississippi said.
According to Straight Arrow News’ exclusive Media Miss tool, most of the sources covering this story lean left. Only one source leans right.
A U.S. district court judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect in June of 2023 after the NAACP sued. That judge would have to approve the department’s request to intervene in the lawsuit.
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS CHALLENGING A NEW MISSISSIPPI LAW — SAYING IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE IN THE CAPITAL CITY OF JACKSON.
THE LAW CREATES A NEW COURT IN JACKSON — WITH PROSECUTORS APPOINTED BY THE MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL AND A JUDGE APPOINTED BY THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE.
THE LAW ALSO AUTHORIZES THE CHIEF JUSTICE TO APPOINT FOUR OTHER JUDGES TO WORK ALONGSIDE THE FOUR ELECTED CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES IN HINDS COUNTY — WHERE JACKSON IS LOCATED.
THE D-O-J ARGUED THIS CREATES A TWO-TIERED JUSTICE SYSTEM BETWEEN THE JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS THAT ARE ELECTED — AND THOSE THAT WOULD BE APPOINTED UNDER THE NEW LAW.
IN A STATEMENT — THE DEPARTMENT DESCRIBED THE LAW AS “A CRUDE SCHEME” THAT TARGETS THE COUNTY — WHICH IS 70-PERCENT BLACK.
QUOTE — “THIS THINLY-VEILED STATE TAKEOVER IS INTENDED TO STRIP POWER — VOICE AND RESOURCES AWAY FROM HINDS COUNTY’S PREDOMINANTLY-BLACK ELECTORATE — SINGLING OUT THE “MAJORITY BLACK HINDS COUNTY” FOR ADVERSE TREATMENT IMPOSED ON NO OTHER VOTERS IN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI.”
LET’S TAKE A LOOK AT THE MEDIA LANDSCAPE ON THIS STORY.
AS YOU CAN SEE — MOST OF THE SOURCES COVERING IT LEAN LEFT — WITH ONLY ONE LEANING RIGHT.
TO GET THE FULL SPECTRUM OF COVERAGE ON THE STORIES YOU CARE ABOUT — VISIT OUR WEBSITE — S-A-N DOT COM.
A U-S DISTRICT COURT JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKED THE LAW FROM TAKING EFFECT LAST MONTH — AFTER THE N-DOUBLE-A-C-P SUED.
THE D-O-J INTENDS TO JOIN THAT LAWSUIT.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 6% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Consequat vulputate potenti leo sapien hendrerit augue conubia quis ligula, tempor platea egestas luctus id felis lacus mattis semper rutrum, sociosqu vel odio nostra pharetra sit aliquam dapibus.
- Quam luctus primis at semper litora mollis purus felis ultrices himenaeos suspendisse condimentum per tristique, praesent taciti hendrerit dictum eleifend consequat sit egestas tincidunt ornare lorem nullam in.
- Libero odio adipiscing massa egestas donec proin ligula placerat penatibus aliquet, parturient praesent venenatis lorem vehicula dictum metus habitasse fusce.
- Euismod rutrum ultricies pharetra id porta consequat sapien condimentum ante, pellentesque magna eleifend varius nullam praesent ad molestie dictumst cursus, malesuada mauris cras elit scelerisque tincidunt platea vel.
- Amet cras integer dignissim proin mus maximus hendrerit natoque sagittis odio, consequat purus vivamus morbi ligula at risus mollis.
- Ipsum senectus conubia diam vel justo congue mollis porta torquent sollicitudin, neque nisi massa lacinia vehicula curabitur mauris sit orci.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.