
Democrats to subpoena billionaires involved in Alito, Thomas vacations
By Ray Bogan (Political Correspondent)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee plan to subpoena Harlan Crow, Leonard Leo and Robin Arkley. Members want to compel the three of them to provide more information about the travel and accommodations they provided to Supreme Court justices.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Reporting from Pro-Publica revealed Crow provided Justice Clarence Thomas with vacations valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars, bought his mother’s house and paid a family member’s tuition. Arkley let Justice Samuel Alito stay at his fishing lodge in Alaska free of charge. Leonard Leo helped organize multiple trips and events that justices attended.
“This vote is the next step in the Committee’s ongoing investigation on the ethics of the Supreme Court. It comes only after Mr. Crow refused to comply with Committee requests, and Mr. Leo and Arkley outright stonewalled the Committee in the exercise of our constitutional authority,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said.
Durbin and other Democratic members of the committee have been in contact with Crow, Leo and Arkley. They wrote a letter to Arkley and Leo in July and again in October, but they did not receive the information they were looking for. In May, Crow said in a letter that he did not believe the committee had the authority to investigate his personal friendship with Justice Thomas.
Senate Democrats are trying to pass the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act. The legislation would require the high court to create a stricter code of conduct, increase reporting requirements for when a justice has a connection with someone involved in a case, and it would require public explanations for recusal decisions.
“Unlike employees of the executive and legislative branches, virtually all of them, unlike Members of Congress and all other federal justices, the nine Supreme Court justices alone decide for themselves what conduct is and is not appropriate,” Durbin said in a statement.
Republicans have called for a stronger ethics code, but also said the Senate should not tell a separate but equal branch of government how to conduct its business.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“This is about the confidence of the American people. And that’s why I think the Supreme Court should look at it, all nine of them. This is not just a job that the chief justice can get done on his own,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told SAN in July when The Associated Press reported that Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s government-paid staff called colleges about buying her book.
There are 11 Democrats on the committee and 10 Republicans, so a party line vote would be enough to approve the subpoenas.
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee plan to subpoena Harlan Crow, Leonard Leo, and Robin Arkley, to compel them to provide more information about the travel and accommodations they provided to Supreme Court Justices.
Reporting from Pro-Publica revealed Crow provided Justice Clarence Thomas with vacations valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars, bought his mother’s house and paid a family member’s tuition. Robin Arkley let Justice Samuel Alito stay at his fishing lodge in Alaska free of charge. Leonord Leo helped organize multiple trips and events that justices attended.
“This vote is the next step in the Committee’s ongoing investigation on the ethics of the Supreme Court. It comes only after Mr. Crow refused to comply with Committee requests, and Mr. Leo and Arkley outright stonewalled the Committee in the exercise of our constitutional authority,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said.
Senate Democrats are trying to pass the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act which would the high court to create a stricter code of conduct, increase reporting requirements for when a justice has a connection with someone involved in the case, and require public explanations for recusal decisions.
Republicans have called for a stronger ethics code, but also expressed concern that the Senate should not tell a separate and equal branch of government how to conduct its business.
“This is this is about the confidence of the American people. And that’s why I think the Supreme Court should look at it, all nine of them. This is not just a job that the chief justice can get done on his own,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told SAN in July when the AP reported that Justice Sotoymayor’s government paid staff called colleges about buying her book.
There are 11 democrats on the committee and 10 Republicans. So a party line vote would just be enough to approve the subpoenas. Straight from DC, I’m Ray Bogan.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to driver burned by hot coffee
Watch 1:31Mar 17 -
Getty Images
Coinbase says SEC is dropping its lawsuit, ‘righting a major wrong’ for crypto
Watch 3:41Feb 21 -
Getty Images
Nebraska looks to bolster cybersecurity by hiring white-hat hacker
Watch 3:10Feb 13