- Chapters
- descriptions off, selected
- captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
- captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Deadspin loses effort to get defamation lawsuit over blackface article tossed
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Ian Kennedy (Lead Video Editor)
A Delaware judge has ruled that a defamation lawsuit against the sports website Deadspin can move forward. The case involves a 9-year-old Kansas City Chiefs fan, Holden Armenta.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 14% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The controversy began when Deadspin published an article criticizing the NFL, featuring an image of Armenta. The article claimed the league needed to speak out “against the fan in black face” and “Native headdress” during a Raiders-Chiefs game last November. However, while the child’s face was painted half-black and half-red, the article only showed the black-painted side.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Holden’s parents filed the defamation lawsuit in February, asserting that their son is a dedicated Chiefs fan who takes pride in his Indian heritage. They claim the article, written by Carron Phillips, smeared their son as a racist.
Phillips stated in the article that the child had “found a way to hate black people and the Native American at the same time,” and suggested that his parents had instilled “hatred” in him.
Both Deadspin and the Armenta family faced backlash after the article went viral. In response, Deadspin changed the headline to “The NFL Must Ban Native Headdress And Culturally Insensitive Face Paint in the Stands,” adding, “We regret any suggestion that we were attacking the fan or his family.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Dissatisfied with this response, the Armenta family proceeded with their defamation lawsuit.
This week, Judge Sean Lugg denied Deadspin’s motion to dismiss the case, stating, “Deadspin published an image of a child displaying his passionate fandom as a backdrop for its critique of the NFL’s diversity efforts… Having reviewed the complaint, the court concludes that Deadspin’s statements accusing H.A. of wearing black face and Native headdress ‘to hate black people and the Native American at the same time,’ and that he was taught this hatred by his parents, are provable false assertions of fact and are therefore actionable.”
A spokesperson for G/O Media, which owns Deadspin, has not commented on the case. The Armenta family’s attorney said they are “eager to present their case to a jury.”
Karah Rucker
A DELAWARE JUDGE HAS RULED A DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST SPORTS WEBSITE DEADSPIN **CAN MOVE FORWARD – THE CASE INVOLVING THIS 9-YEAR-OLD KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FAN.
THE IMAGE WENT VIRAL AFTER THE PUBLICATION PUT THIS PICTURE FRONT AND CENTER ON AN ARTICLE CRITICIZING THE NFL –
SAYING THE LEAGUE NEEDED TO SPEAK OUT “AGAINST THE FAN IN BLACK FACE” AND “NATIVE HEADRESS” AT A RAIDERS-CHIEFS GAME LAST NOVEMBER.
THE PROBLEM – “HOLDEN ARMENTA’S” FACE WAS PAINTED BLACK ON HALF OF HIS FACE – THE OTHER HALF WAS RED – BUT THAT WASN’T SHOWN IN THE ARTICLE.
HOLDEN’S PARENTS FILED THE DEFAMATION LAWSUIT IN FEBRUARY–
THEY SAY THEIR SON IS A DEDICATED CHIEFS FAN WITH AN APPRECIATION FOR HIS OWN INDIAN HERITAGE –
SAYING THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED BY DEADSPIN WRITER “CARRON PHILLIPS” SMEARED THEIR SON AS A RACIST.
PHILLIPS WROTE WITHIN THE ARTICLE THAT THE KID PICTURED HAD “FOUND A WAY TO HATE BLACK PEOPLE AND THE NATIVE AMERICAN AT THE SAME TIME” AND SUGGESTED THAT HIS PARENTS HAD INSTILLED “HATRED” IN HIM.
BOTH DEADSPIN AND THE PARENTS RECEIVED BACKLASH AFTER THE ARTICLE WENT VIRAL.
DEADSPIN LATER CHANGED THE HEADLINE TO “THE NFL MUST BAN NATIVE HEADDRESS AND CULTURALLY INSENSITIVE FACE PAINT IN THE STANDS,” STATING, “WE REGRET ANY SUGGESTION THAT WE WERE ATTACKING THE FAN OR HIS FAMILY.”
UNHAPPY WITH THEIR RESPONSE – THE ARMENTA FAMILY FILED A DEFAMATION LAWSUIT –
AND THIS WEEK – A JUDGE DENIED DEADSPIN’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE CASE.
Judge sean lugg writing –
“Deadspin published an image of a child displaying his passionate fandom as a backdrop for its critique of the NFL’s diversity efforts…”
“The statements accusing (HOLDEN ARMENTA) H.A. of wearing black face and Native headdress ‘to hate black people and the Native American at the same time’ are provable false assertions of fact.”
A SPOKESPERSON FOR “G/O MEDIA” WHICH OWNS DEADSPIN HAS NOT COMMENTED ON THE CASE MOVING FORWARD.
THE ARMENTA FAMILY’S ATTORNEY SAYS THEY ARE “EAGER TO PRESENT THEIR CASE TO A JURY.”
THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.
FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –
DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP
OR VISIT US AT SAN DOT COM.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 14% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.