CIA director denies classified info was on Houthi strike group chat


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • The director of National Intelligence and CIA director both denied classified information was disclosed in a group chat among Trump cabinet members. The group used the encrypted app Signal to discuss plans for air strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
  • A journalist publicized the group chat and the disclosure of sensitive military plans after he was inadvertently added to the chat.
  • President Donald Trump said he is standing by his National Security adviser despite the security breach.

Full Story

The director of National Intelligence and the CIA director both denied on Tuesday, March 25, that classified information was shared in a group chat. In the group chat, members of President Donald Trump’s cabinet discussed plans for an air strike on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

The chat took place on the encrypted messaging app Signal. It was only made public after a journalist was inadvertently added. 

What did officials say at the hearing?

“Secretary Hegseth put into this group text a detailed operation plan including targets, the weapons we were going to be using, attack sequences and timing. And yet, you’ve testified that nothing in that chain was classified. Wouldn’t that be classified?” Sen. Angus King, I-Maine said at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. “What if that had been made public that morning before the attack took place?” 

“Senator, I can attest to the fact that there were no classified or intelligence equities that were included in that chat group at any time,” Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard replied. 

“So the attack sequencing and timing and weapons and targets you don’t consider to should have been classified?” King asked. 

“I defer to the secretary of Defense and the National Security Council on that question,” Gabbard answered.

“Well, you’re the head of the intelligence community. You’re supposed to know about classifications,” King said. 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe stated, “My communications to be clear, in the Signal message group, were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information.” 

Once the nation’s top intelligence officials repeatedly put themselves on the record as saying there was no classified information, Senators started asking for the messages to be released. 

“If there was no classified material, share it with the committee. You can’t have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is our national security,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va, said.

What is Signal?

Signal is a free application for messages and calls. The company describes its product as state-of-the-art end-to-end encryption. 

“We can’t read your messages or listen to your calls, and no one else can either. Privacy isn’t an optional mode — it’s just the way that Signal works,” the company states on its website.  

The CIA director indicated the use of the app is standard practice. 

Ratcliffe stated CIA officials loaded the Signal app onto his computer when he was first confirmed as director. He said this happens to most CIA officers. He added the CIA records management office told him Signal is permissible for work use and that the practice goes back to the Biden administration.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency recommends that “highly targeted individuals” use end-to-end encryption for mobile communications. 

The guidance states, “Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end encryption, such as Signal or similar apps.”

However, it is not clear if planning for a military strike and sharing details of the operation fall under standard mobile communications being referenced in the guidance. 

Multiple outlets are reporting Trump decided National Security Adviser Mike Waltz will not lose his job because of the incident.

“Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump told NBC news.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Signal chat incident as a "scandal" and a display of "careless" and "incompetent" behavior by Trump administration officials, emphasizing calls for resignation and potential security breaches.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right downplay the incident, using terms like "sensationalist" to describe critical reporting and highlighting officials' denials of leaked classified information; they framed the attacks discussed as "highly successful" and portrayed critics like Senator Warner as "hypocrites," focusing on his past communications rather than the core issue.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

95 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Multiple senior Trump officials allegedly discussed war plans in a civilian messaging app, leading to calls for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz to resign or be fired due to this scandal.
  • The National Security Council confirmed the authenticity of the text thread while Senate Committee hearings emphasized the incompetence in handling classified information, particularly regarding the app Signal.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senators questioned CIA Director John Ratcliffe about a leaked Signal chat that included Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg and discussed military strikes on the Houthis in Yemen.
  • Ratcliffe acknowledged that Jeffrey Goldberg was added to the chat but denied sharing classified information, stating, "I don’t use the app to share classified information."
  • Sen. Michael Bennet criticized the chat as "sloppiness, this incompetence" that is "entirely unacceptable," demanding accountability from officials.
  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the national security team, asserting that the discussed attacks on the Houthis were "highly successful and effective."

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™
This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • The director of National Intelligence and CIA director both denied classified information was disclosed in a group chat among Trump cabinet members. The group used the encrypted app Signal to discuss plans for air strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
  • A journalist publicized the group chat and the disclosure of sensitive military plans after he was inadvertently added to the chat.
  • President Donald Trump said he is standing by his National Security adviser despite the security breach.

Full Story

The director of National Intelligence and the CIA director both denied on Tuesday, March 25, that classified information was shared in a group chat. In the group chat, members of President Donald Trump’s cabinet discussed plans for an air strike on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

The chat took place on the encrypted messaging app Signal. It was only made public after a journalist was inadvertently added. 

What did officials say at the hearing?

“Secretary Hegseth put into this group text a detailed operation plan including targets, the weapons we were going to be using, attack sequences and timing. And yet, you’ve testified that nothing in that chain was classified. Wouldn’t that be classified?” Sen. Angus King, I-Maine said at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. “What if that had been made public that morning before the attack took place?” 

“Senator, I can attest to the fact that there were no classified or intelligence equities that were included in that chat group at any time,” Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard replied. 

“So the attack sequencing and timing and weapons and targets you don’t consider to should have been classified?” King asked. 

“I defer to the secretary of Defense and the National Security Council on that question,” Gabbard answered.

“Well, you’re the head of the intelligence community. You’re supposed to know about classifications,” King said. 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe stated, “My communications to be clear, in the Signal message group, were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information.” 

Once the nation’s top intelligence officials repeatedly put themselves on the record as saying there was no classified information, Senators started asking for the messages to be released. 

“If there was no classified material, share it with the committee. You can’t have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is our national security,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va, said.

What is Signal?

Signal is a free application for messages and calls. The company describes its product as state-of-the-art end-to-end encryption. 

“We can’t read your messages or listen to your calls, and no one else can either. Privacy isn’t an optional mode — it’s just the way that Signal works,” the company states on its website.  

The CIA director indicated the use of the app is standard practice. 

Ratcliffe stated CIA officials loaded the Signal app onto his computer when he was first confirmed as director. He said this happens to most CIA officers. He added the CIA records management office told him Signal is permissible for work use and that the practice goes back to the Biden administration.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency recommends that “highly targeted individuals” use end-to-end encryption for mobile communications. 

The guidance states, “Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end encryption, such as Signal or similar apps.”

However, it is not clear if planning for a military strike and sharing details of the operation fall under standard mobile communications being referenced in the guidance. 

Multiple outlets are reporting Trump decided National Security Adviser Mike Waltz will not lose his job because of the incident.

“Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump told NBC news.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Signal chat incident as a "scandal" and a display of "careless" and "incompetent" behavior by Trump administration officials, emphasizing calls for resignation and potential security breaches.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right downplay the incident, using terms like "sensationalist" to describe critical reporting and highlighting officials' denials of leaked classified information; they framed the attacks discussed as "highly successful" and portrayed critics like Senator Warner as "hypocrites," focusing on his past communications rather than the core issue.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

95 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Multiple senior Trump officials allegedly discussed war plans in a civilian messaging app, leading to calls for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz to resign or be fired due to this scandal.
  • The National Security Council confirmed the authenticity of the text thread while Senate Committee hearings emphasized the incompetence in handling classified information, particularly regarding the app Signal.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senators questioned CIA Director John Ratcliffe about a leaked Signal chat that included Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg and discussed military strikes on the Houthis in Yemen.
  • Ratcliffe acknowledged that Jeffrey Goldberg was added to the chat but denied sharing classified information, stating, "I don’t use the app to share classified information."
  • Sen. Michael Bennet criticized the chat as "sloppiness, this incompetence" that is "entirely unacceptable," demanding accountability from officials.
  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the national security team, asserting that the discussed attacks on the Houthis were "highly successful and effective."

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™