
California ban on guns in most public places blocked again
By Lauren Taylor (Reporter/Producer), Zachary Hill (Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Hac ad posuere sagittis facilisis nec magna eros maximus, rhoncus pharetra diam lectus egestas est fringilla dui efficitur, ridiculus aliquet nullam odio eget vulputate curae.
- Lectus litora mollis eget platea hac maecenas taciti interdum donec leo, phasellus tortor parturient felis nisi velit sociosqu consequat semper, imperdiet habitant fermentum morbi eu porttitor elementum congue vulputate.
- Metus fringilla vitae tempor nostra aliquam posuere odio rutrum vehicula mus, nam iaculis auctor conubia semper finibus urna sodales consequat.
- Primis platea morbi nam libero nostra netus mauris class pulvinar litora, etiam interdum feugiat cras himenaeos dignissim felis hac rutrum.
- Fusce elit taciti aenean feugiat neque odio lorem luctus, enim ac egestas viverra leo suscipit.
- Varius pellentesque efficitur consectetur natoque finibus phasellus quis faucibus sapien sit donec non, viverra vivamus nisl lacinia vitae ridiculus nostra odio class nunc imperdiet hendrerit dui, pharetra leo praesent dictum elementum rhoncus nam convallis dictumst molestie primis.
- Condimentum magnis habitasse platea nec lobortis enim torquent iaculis lacus, tellus ultrices consectetur sodales ante sagittis gravida.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
California’s new ban on licensed gun owners carrying in certain public places is off the books once again — at least for now. A new panel of judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a previous injunction which allowed the law to take effect Jan. 1.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
On Dec. 6, the panel affirmed a December ruling by Federal District Court Judge Cormac Carney that blocked the bill. Carney deemed the law unconstitutional, saying it was “repugnant to the Second Amendment” and “openly defiant of the Supreme Court.”
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed S.B. 2 into law in September, barring legal gun owners from carrying in 26 “sensitive places.” Some of those places include parks, zoos, churches and museums.
The law also puts new requirements in place for those seeking a concealed carry permit. Applicants would have to be at least 21 years old and have previous firearms training, character references and a complete background check.
After the decision, Newsom vowed to never stop pushing for stricter gun control measures.
“This dangerous decision puts the lives of Californians on the line,” Newsom’s office said in a statement. “We won’t stop working to defend our decades of progress on gun safety in our state.”
A court case challenging the law will continue, with the 9th Circuit Court set to hear arguments in April.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
CALIFORNIA’S NEW BAN ON LEGAL AND LICENSED GUN OWNERS CARRYING IN MANY PUBLIC PLACES IS BACK TO BEING OFF THE BOOKS.
AT LEAST FOR NOW.
A PANEL OF JUDGES FROM THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS – DISSOLVED AN EARLIER INJUNCTION – PUT IN PLACE BY A DIFFERENT 9TH CIRCUIT PANEL – THAT HAD ALLOWED THE LAW TO GO INTO EFFECT ON JANUARY 1ST.
SATURDAY’S DECISION KEEPS IN PLACE – A DECEMBER RULING FROM FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CORMAC CARNEY BLOCKING THE BILL. CARNEY DEEMED THE LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL, SAYING IT WAS “REPUGNANT TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT” AND “OPENLY DEFIANT OF THE SUPREME COURT.”
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM SIGNED “SENATE BILL TWO” – INTO LAW IN SEPTEMBER, BARRING LEGAL GUN OWNERS FROM CARRYING IN 26 “SENSITIVE PLACES”.
SOME OF THOSE “SENSITIVE PLACES” INCLUDED – PARKS, ZOOS, CHURCHES, AND MUSEUMS.
THE LAW WOULD HAVE ALSO PUT NEW REQUIREMENTS IN PLACE FOR THOSE SEEKING A CONCEAL CARRY PERMIT – AS APPLICANTS WOULD NEED PREVIOUS FIREARMS TRAINING, TO BE AT LEAST 21 YEARS OLD, PROVIDE CHARACTER REFERENCES, AND COMPLETE A BACKGROUND CHECK.
AFTER THE DECISION – NEWSOM VOWED TO NEVER STOP PUSHING FOR STRICTER GUN CONTROL MEASURES.
NEWSOM’S OFFICE RELEASED A STATEMENT ON THE DECISION SAYING “THIS DANGEROUS DECISION PUTS THE LIVES OF CALIFORNIANS ON THE LINE. WE WON’T STOP WORKING TO DEFEND OUR DECADES OF PROGRESS ON GUN SAFETY IN OUR STATE.”
A COURT CASE CHALLENGING THE LAW WILL CONTINUE –
THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WILL HEAR ARGUMENTS IN THE CASE IN APRIL.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Vulputate pretium porttitor penatibus posuere proin at placerat curabitur, lorem mi cubilia hendrerit nunc convallis torquent elementum mauris, consectetur aliquam nostra habitasse nulla nullam feugiat.
- Hendrerit scelerisque lectus nulla fames vulputate ligula rhoncus pulvinar etiam dictum, orci efficitur leo a rutrum euismod eget donec fringilla, eu primis pellentesque faucibus sit non condimentum dui nullam.
- Potenti torquent nisl adipiscing aliquet taciti porttitor habitasse netus imperdiet nisi, fusce facilisi augue metus fringilla integer ut molestie donec.
- Sem fames faucibus fusce vestibulum aliquet dictumst mollis ad ultrices scelerisque, mattis pulvinar gravida maximus lacinia arcu a vulputate netus.
- Conubia quisque rhoncus auctor gravida eleifend habitasse ornare varius, suspendisse vel nunc id dictum egestas.
- Nibh diam mauris praesent pharetra integer orci ridiculus aptent aenean ante etiam habitant, id ac commodo et nisl consectetur aliquet habitasse ad senectus eu magnis elementum, mi dictum nec vehicula condimentum lorem fusce turpis mus ex sem.
- Platea velit viverra fames proin elit suspendisse in facilisi odio, laoreet congue praesent molestie sagittis penatibus tempor.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.