
Biden’s DOJ wants to break up Google, here’s where Trump stands
By Simone Del Rosario (Business Correspondent), Brent Jabbour (Senior Producer), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
The U.S. government under President Joe Biden wants to break up Google. But will the same hold true when the White House changes hands in January?
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Rutrum vestibulum vehicula semper urna convallis blandit ac lectus, felis lacinia tincidunt pretium inceptos volutpat eu, ullamcorper porta fringilla facilisi imperdiet dapibus justo.
- Dolor proin pharetra placerat cubilia risus felis phasellus sodales faucibus laoreet, facilisi scelerisque tortor aliquet platea justo potenti parturient lacus.
- Auctor consequat consectetur senectus taciti hac tellus sagittis mauris pharetra lacus eu metus dolor, volutpat adipiscing convallis et vel litora praesent elementum leo vitae enim sociosqu.
- Inceptos sollicitudin curae congue sagittis imperdiet dapibus felis cras integer pretium curabitur nunc, morbi dis ridiculus quisque urna consequat tincidunt facilisis tempor montes elementum.
- Nibh dolor habitant id augue porttitor finibus semper velit vulputate integer pellentesque risus montes leo, rhoncus potenti mauris purus sollicitudin lectus tellus platea magna scelerisque fermentum quam.
- Porta maximus dapibus sed mauris pretium eros interdum mattis dis conubia elit tincidunt nam diam felis, nibh senectus nec duis nullam eu ante morbi pulvinar accumsan habitasse placerat condimentum.
- Platea dapibus facilisis odio nullam elementum enim convallis massa ultricies, velit sollicitudin parturient tristique senectus ornare lectus.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Back in August, a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained a monopoly in internet search. This gave the Department of Justice a major antitrust victory in a case that actually started during the first Trump administration.
Now, the Biden DOJ says competition cannot be restored unless Google is forced to sell off Chrome, its dominant web browser. Judge Amit Mehta set a two-week hearing on remedies for April 2025, when President-elect Donald Trump will be back in charge of the DOJ.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“The new administration could come forward and say, ‘We mentioned a breakup – we don’t have the enthusiasm for it that we did before. Of course, Judge, if you thought it was appropriate, that’s your call, it’s not ours; you are ultimately the decision maker about remedy. But our view is that it’s no longer required and we’re not asking for it,'” former FTC Chair Bill Kovacic proposed as one possibility in an interview with SAN.
While Trump is no fan of Big Tech or Google, he has so far sidestepped calling for a breakup. In an interview with Bloomberg, Trump said Google was “rigged” but stopped short of saying he’d break them up.
“He said that he might not be fond of a breakup, that Google’s an important company, don’t want to injure them in some way,” Kovacic said.
However, he pointed out that prominent figures in Trump’s campaign, including his running mate, JD Vance, have made comments in support of breaking up Google.
“It seems within the upper echelon of the Trump brain trust that there’s a lot of enthusiasm for going through with the structural remedy,” Kovacic said.
Google said it is appealing the August ruling.
“The DOJ continues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case,” Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland told SAN in a statement. “The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed.”
“We haven’t had something like this in ages, that is, to have the elaborate discussion of what antitrust law should do after a finding of liability in this kind of setting,” Kovacic said, “Google has the opportunity to come forward and say, ‘You wanted an extraordinary form of intervention. We have something that is much better, equally effective and not as disruptive.’”
In other words, while Google is appealing the monopoly ruling, it can still suggest less extreme remedies as the case proceeds.
The last time antitrust officials tried to break up a Big Tech company of this magnitude was Microsoft in the late ’90s and early 2000s. In the end, through a convoluted appeals process, the DOJ eventually backed off its call to break up Microsoft and settled for a lesser antitrust penalty.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“A big part of the task of the Justice Department in the coming months, if they want a breakup, is to give the judge assurances that it’s worth doing,” Kovacic said. “A number of judges in the past have said, ‘I’m a single unelected official bearing the burden of determining the future of an important sector. That makes me nervous. I’m willing to travel the path that the government suggests, but I want assurances that it is the right path.'”
[Simone Del Rosario]
It’s official. The U.S. government wants to break up Google. But will the same hold true when the White House changes hands in January?
Back in August, a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained a monopoly in internet search. This gave the Department of Justice a major antitrust victory in a case that actually started during the first Trump administration.
Now, the Biden DOJ says competition cannot be restored unless Google is forced to sell off Chrome, its dominant web browser.
Judge Amit Mehta set a two-week hearing on remedies for April – when President-elect Donald Trump will be back in charge of the DOJ.
Bill Kovacic: The new administration could come forward and say, ‘We mentioned a breakup. We don’t have the enthusiasm for it that we did before. Of course, Judge, if you thought it was appropriate, that’s your call. It’s not ours. You are ultimately the decision maker about remedy, but our view is that it’s no longer required, and we’re not asking for it.’
Simone Del Rosario: Ok, so that’s a possibility. What has Trump said about it all? While he’s certainly no fan of Big Tech or Google, he has so far sidestepped calling for a breakup.
Donald Trump: I think Google’s rigged just like our government is rigged all over the place.
Bloomberg EIC: So you would break them up, in other words.
Donald Trump: I’d do something. You have to have, look, I give them a lot of credit. They’ve become such a power, such a power, and you’ve got to give them credit for that. How they become a power is really the discussion. At the same time, it’s a very dangerous thing because we want to have great companies, we don’t want China to have these companies.
Bill Kovacic: He said that he might not be fond of a breakup, that Google’s an important company. Don’t want to injure them in some way. I don’t know if that was a well-considered view about remedies, but his nominee to head the Department of Justice, Matt Gaetz, has said, breakup sounds good to me when it comes to this company. And the Vice President-elect Vance has said, breaking them up sounds good to me too. So it seems within the upper echelon of the Trump brain trust that there’s a lot of enthusiasm for going through with the structural remedy.
Simone Del Rosario: Google is appealing the ruling, telling Straight Arrow News, “The DOJ cotinues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case. The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed.”
Bill Kovacic: We haven’t had something like this in ages, that is, to have the elaborate discussion of what antitrust law should do after a finding of liability in this kind of setting, Google has the opportunity to come forward and say, ‘You wanted an extraordinary form of intervention. We have something that is much better, equally effective and not as disruptive.’
Simone Del Rosario: The last time antitrust officials tried to break up a Big Tech company of this magnitude, it was Microsoft in the late ’90s and early 2000s. In the end, through a convoluted appeals process, the DOJ eventually backed off its call to break up Microsoft and settled for a lesser antitrust penalty.
Bill Kovacic: A big part of the task of the Justice Department in the coming months, if they want a breakup, is to give the judge assurances that it’s worth doing. A number of judges in the past have said, I’m a single unelected official bearing the burden of determining the future of an important sector that makes me nervous. I’m willing to travel the path that the government suggests, but I want assurances that it is the right path.
Simone Del Rosario: For more on what Google has been accused of and potential fixes that involve Android and more, search “Google Monopoly” for this story with all the Google apps at SAN.com and the Straight Arrow News app.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Massa augue pharetra quisque rhoncus ipsum habitasse hendrerit fringilla, auctor fusce accumsan diam cubilia lorem bibendum, praesent id dignissim litora iaculis a ut.
- Vehicula nostra orci imperdiet suscipit eu auctor volutpat conubia ultrices enim, litora dapibus velit phasellus sed ut quis aenean faucibus.
- Porta dolor convallis dis interdum ex nisi magna aliquet orci faucibus bibendum sem vehicula, lorem blandit ipsum taciti maximus curae et nullam parturient ante consectetur ullamcorper.
- Cubilia turpis sodales viverra magna iaculis a auctor non scelerisque diam in fermentum, lacinia vulputate aliquam nisl rhoncus dolor accumsan congue molestie sollicitudin nullam.
- Laoreet vehicula aptent justo nulla pretium nunc quisque proin metus scelerisque leo eu sollicitudin parturient, morbi quis aliquet purus turpis fringilla nisi sed cursus dapibus finibus mi.
- Id potenti a pulvinar aliquet diam feugiat natoque tempor vulputate facilisi ac accumsan habitant magnis auctor, laoreet dis mus libero primis bibendum at lacinia dui sit duis imperdiet commodo.
- Sed a congue condimentum primis nullam consectetur ipsum maecenas ad, proin turpis aenean ridiculus dis mauris fringilla.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.