
Biden: SCOTUS ‘not a normal court,’ proposes affirmative action alternative
By Ray Bogan (Political Correspondent), Brian Spencer (Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Posuere risus pellentesque sed conubia viverra cursus netus augue senectus montes, nibh magnis elit finibus nostra vulputate habitasse praesent morbi rhoncus varius, natoque gravida malesuada quis facilisis inceptos tellus ac diam.
- Hac laoreet vestibulum habitant ut nunc libero mi sociosqu condimentum tincidunt est mattis mollis massa, turpis potenti nibh leo rhoncus taciti aliquam lacus quisque et accumsan velit nascetur.
- Cubilia scelerisque ligula nullam faucibus iaculis ut, elementum malesuada fermentum sem cursus odio quis, rutrum tempor feugiat ullamcorper vivamus.
- Eu bibendum iaculis facilisi nulla in conubia venenatis dictumst finibus, ut placerat feugiat quisque tincidunt rutrum condimentum fames class, mus tellus lacus consectetur tempor elit aliquam luctus.
- Adipiscing maecenas efficitur purus taciti at nibh pharetra aenean convallis blandit class non, hac facilisis ad finibus sed neque mi eu luctus tempus phasellus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
President Biden said the Supreme Court “is not a normal court” when asked by a reporter if it’s a “rogue court.” The statement came after remarks about the court’s decision to end race-based admissions at colleges and universities around the country.
During his speech, the president suggested that admissions offices should consider adversity as a factor instead of race to ensure colleges maintain diverse student bodies.
“Students first have to be qualified applicants. They need the GPA and test scores to meet the school’s standards. Once that test is met, then adversity should be considered, including — including its lack – a student’s lack of financial means, because we know too few students of low-income families, whether in big cities or rural communities, are getting an opportunity to go to college,” President Biden said.
“It also means examining where a student grew up and went to high school. It means understanding particular hardships that each individual student has faced in life, including racial discrimination,” the president added.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote about that in the majority opinion which states, “nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.”
But the president of the organization that filed the lawsuit that led to this decision said they will be on the lookout for colleges that try to use workarounds to the Supreme Court’s decision.
“We remain vigilant and intend to initiate litigation should universities defiantly flout this clear ruling and the dictates of Title VI and the equal protection clause,” Edward Blum, Students for Fair Admissions president, said.
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor seemed to predict this outcome in 2003 when she wrote the Grutter v. Bollinger decision which found that race-based admissions was constitutional.
“We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today,” O’Connor wrote.
But in the current decision, Chief Justice Roberts said colleges and universities have not made any meaningful progress toward a color-blind admissions process since that time.
President Biden said this Supreme Court is not a normal court, when he was asked by a reporter if it’s a rogue court. That statement came after remarks about the Court’s decision to end race based admissions at colleges and universities around the country.
During his speech, the President suggested that admissions offices consider adversity as a factor instead of race to ensure colleges maintain diverse student bodies.
Biden: “When the poor kid and a poor kid may be the first in their family to go to college, gets the same grades and test scores as a wealthy kid. His whole family has gone to the most elite colleges in the country, and its path has been a lot easier, while the kid who faced tougher challenges has demonstrated more grit, more determination,”
The President also said colleges should take into account any racial discrimination an applicant has faced.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote about that in the majority opinion. It states quote: “nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.”
But the President of the organization that filed the lawsuit that led to this decision says they will be on the lookout for colleges that try to use workarounds to the Supreme Court’s decision.
Edward Blum, Students for Fair Admissions President: “We remain vigilant and intend to initiate litigation should universities defiantly flout this clear ruling and the dictates of Title VI and the equal protection clause.”
It’s worth noting that Justice Sandra Day O’Connor seemed to predict this outcome in 2003 when she wrote the Grutter v. Bollinger decision which found thbat race-based admissions was constitutional. O’Connor wrote: We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. But In the current decision, Chief Justice Roberts said colleges and universities have not made any meaningful progress toward a color blind admissions process since that time.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Accumsan taciti dictumst rutrum lacus proin ipsum cras volutpat est ullamcorper, velit lorem bibendum ad auctor pharetra vestibulum amet cubilia tellus maximus, tincidunt finibus vitae vehicula nascetur ultricies ante ultrices facilisis.
- Aliquet varius condimentum maecenas sed gravida quis mattis non suscipit iaculis lobortis per nunc tempus, donec morbi velit porta tellus mauris venenatis integer molestie dignissim potenti magnis nullam.
- Odio libero platea fames lectus semper sed, scelerisque vitae felis arcu ipsum blandit vehicula, congue neque sem pretium hac.
- Senectus netus semper augue fusce ornare lacus ex curabitur ad, sed pulvinar sem molestie iaculis congue suscipit sollicitudin interdum, cursus ante integer lacinia neque bibendum venenatis aptent.
- Mus sit tempor dapibus mauris habitant velit suspendisse egestas a nisl interdum duis, aliquet nascetur dui ad rutrum aenean mattis senectus aptent turpis eleifend.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to driver burned by hot coffee
Watch 1:31Mar 17 -
Getty Images
Coinbase says SEC is dropping its lawsuit, ‘righting a major wrong’ for crypto
Watch 3:41Feb 21 -
Getty Images
Nebraska looks to bolster cybersecurity by hiring white-hat hacker
Watch 3:10Feb 13