Ben & Jerry’s alleges its CEO was fired for political reasons


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company, Unilever, of firing CEO David Stever over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. The company claims Stever was ousted without board approval.
  • Ben & Jerry’s has a long history of progressive activism, including statements on political issues such as supporting a ceasefire in Gaza in January 2024.
  • Unilever has not commented on the amended lawsuit but previously stated it would defend itself against Ben & Jerry’s claims.

Full Story

Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company of firing its CEO over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. In an amended court filing from Tuesday, March 18, the ice cream company said CEO David Stever was ousted without the board’s approval after he made public comments on progressive issues.

The company initially filed a lawsuit in November accusing its conglomerate owner, Unilever, of silencing its public statements in support of Palestinian refugees amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

In January 2024, the Ben & Jerry’s board issued a statement to the Financial Times calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, with its chair saying that “peace is a core value” of the company.

According to the amended complaint, Stever was fired March 3, after Unilever “repeatedly threatened” the ice cream maker’s employees “should they fail to comply with Unilever’s efforts to silence the social mission,” Ben & Jerry’s filing said.

Lawyers for Ben & Jerry’s said terms in its 2000 merger protect “Ben & Jerry’s interests by precluding the unilateral removal of its CEO.”

What is the history of Ben & Jerry’s taking a political stance?

Since the company debuted in 1978, it’s been known for its left-leaning advocacy and was able to maintain an independent board of directors, furthering its progressive activism even after it sold to Unilever in 2000.

The company continued to share its stance on various political and social issues over the years, including a statement on Jan. 7, 2021, calling the Jan. 6 Capitol attack a “Riot to uphold white supremacy.” 

In another instance in July 2021, tensions escalated when Ben & Jerry’s said it would stop selling ice cream to Israelis in the West Bank, reiterating its stance in 2022 on X.

“We continue to believe it is inconsistent with Ben & Jerry’s values for our ice cream to be sold in the occupied Palestinian territory.”

Unilever has not commented on the amended filing but said last year it would defend itself against the November lawsuit, which claims it stopped letting Ben & Jerry’s take certain political stances.

What happens next?

In March 2024, Unilever announced its plans to spin off its ice cream division, including Ben & Jerry’s, later in 2025. If the move is successful, it will end the companies’ partnership, which has spanned two and a half decades.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the CEO's removal as retaliation for Ben & Jerry's "courageously advanced" social and political activism, emphasizing Unilever's alleged attempts to "silence" the company's mission and progressive values.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right acknowledged the activism but focused on specific instances where Unilever blocked statements, including support for Palestinian refugees and student protesters, further alleging that Unilever's actions "undermine" the 2000 merger agreement.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

77 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Ben & Jerry's claims its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
  • Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, about the removal of Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
  • Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
  • Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Ben & Jerry’s claims that Unilever unlawfully removed CEO David Stever due to political activism, as stated in their court filing.
  • The filing alleges that Unilever aimed to silence Ben & Jerry’s social mission, threatening personnel if they did not comply.
  • Unilever's actions allegedly violate a 2000 merger agreement, which grants the independent board authority over social missions.
  • Tensions escalated after Ben & Jerry’s stopped sales in the West Bank and faced restrictions on political statements.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™
This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company, Unilever, of firing CEO David Stever over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. The company claims Stever was ousted without board approval.
  • Ben & Jerry’s has a long history of progressive activism, including statements on political issues such as supporting a ceasefire in Gaza in January 2024.
  • Unilever has not commented on the amended lawsuit but previously stated it would defend itself against Ben & Jerry’s claims.

Full Story

Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company of firing its CEO over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. In an amended court filing from Tuesday, March 18, the ice cream company said CEO David Stever was ousted without the board’s approval after he made public comments on progressive issues.

The company initially filed a lawsuit in November accusing its conglomerate owner, Unilever, of silencing its public statements in support of Palestinian refugees amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

In January 2024, the Ben & Jerry’s board issued a statement to the Financial Times calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, with its chair saying that “peace is a core value” of the company.

According to the amended complaint, Stever was fired March 3, after Unilever “repeatedly threatened” the ice cream maker’s employees “should they fail to comply with Unilever’s efforts to silence the social mission,” Ben & Jerry’s filing said.

Lawyers for Ben & Jerry’s said terms in its 2000 merger protect “Ben & Jerry’s interests by precluding the unilateral removal of its CEO.”

What is the history of Ben & Jerry’s taking a political stance?

Since the company debuted in 1978, it’s been known for its left-leaning advocacy and was able to maintain an independent board of directors, furthering its progressive activism even after it sold to Unilever in 2000.

The company continued to share its stance on various political and social issues over the years, including a statement on Jan. 7, 2021, calling the Jan. 6 Capitol attack a “Riot to uphold white supremacy.” 

In another instance in July 2021, tensions escalated when Ben & Jerry’s said it would stop selling ice cream to Israelis in the West Bank, reiterating its stance in 2022 on X.

“We continue to believe it is inconsistent with Ben & Jerry’s values for our ice cream to be sold in the occupied Palestinian territory.”

Unilever has not commented on the amended filing but said last year it would defend itself against the November lawsuit, which claims it stopped letting Ben & Jerry’s take certain political stances.

What happens next?

In March 2024, Unilever announced its plans to spin off its ice cream division, including Ben & Jerry’s, later in 2025. If the move is successful, it will end the companies’ partnership, which has spanned two and a half decades.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the CEO's removal as retaliation for Ben & Jerry's "courageously advanced" social and political activism, emphasizing Unilever's alleged attempts to "silence" the company's mission and progressive values.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right acknowledged the activism but focused on specific instances where Unilever blocked statements, including support for Palestinian refugees and student protesters, further alleging that Unilever's actions "undermine" the 2000 merger agreement.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

77 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Ben & Jerry's claims its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
  • Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, about the removal of Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
  • Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
  • Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Ben & Jerry’s claims that Unilever unlawfully removed CEO David Stever due to political activism, as stated in their court filing.
  • The filing alleges that Unilever aimed to silence Ben & Jerry’s social mission, threatening personnel if they did not comply.
  • Unilever's actions allegedly violate a 2000 merger agreement, which grants the independent board authority over social missions.
  • Tensions escalated after Ben & Jerry’s stopped sales in the West Bank and faced restrictions on political statements.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™