Skip to main content
U.S.

Appeals court upholds federal government ban on TikTok

Listen
Share

Millions of TikTok users could be in for a bit of shock come late January 2025. A federal appeals court ruled the ban or forced sale of TikTok by the Justice Department is constitutional and can move forward.

Back in April 2025, The Biden Administration argued that the law is necessary to protect national security interests from TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance. Such threats include data security breaches and possible foreign influence on American political campaigns.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

TikTok lawyers countered and appealed, claiming the law infringes on free speech rights of millions of users on the popular app. They deny it could be used by the Chinese government to spy on, or manipulate, Americans.

However, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington D.C. on Friday, Dec. 6, sided with the Biden administration. The court ruled that the first amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States. It determined the government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.

TikTok now has until Jan. 19, 2025 to find a buyer and break ties with its China-based parent company or get an extension from the Biden administration if there is progress toward a sale. Ultimately, the social media platform could become unavailable in the United States.

This high profile case could wind-up in front of the U.S Supreme Court. It’s worth noting that President-elect Donald Trump said on the campaign trail that he is against a ban on TikTok, having initially been in favor of one.

Tags: , , , , ,

[CRAIG NIGRELLI]

MILLIONS OF TIKTOK USERS COULD BE IN FOR A BIT OF A SHOCK COME LATE JANUARY. A FEDERAL APPEALS COURT HAS RULED THE BAN OR FORCED SALE OF TIK TOK, BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND CAN MOVE FORWARD.
BACK IN APRIL, THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ARGUED THAT THE LAW IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT NATIONAL SECURITY FROM TIKTOK’S CHINA-BASED PARENT COMPANY, BYTEDANCE. SUCH THREATS INCLUDE DATA SECURITY BREACHES AND POSSIBLE FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON AMERICAN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS.
TIKTOK COUNTERED THAT THE LAW INFINGES ON FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF MILLIONS OF USERS ON THE POPULAR APP. IT HAS DENIED IT COULD USED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT TO SPY ON OR MANIPULATE AMERICANS.
HOWEVER THE U-S COURT OF APPEALS IN WASHINGTON D-C, ON FRIDAY, UNANIMOUSLY SIDED WITH THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION… RULING “ THE FIRST AMENDMENT EXISTS TO PROTECT FREE SPEECH IN THE UNITED STATES. HERE THE GOVERNMENT ACTED SOLELY TO PROTECT THAT FREEDOM FROM A FOREIGN ADVERSARY NATION AND TO LIMIT THAT ADVERSARY’S ABILITY TO GATHER DATA ON PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES. “
TIKTOK NOW HAS UNTIL JANUARY 19TH OF 2025 TO FIND A BUYER AND BREAK TIES WITH ITS CHINA-BASED PARENT COMPANY OR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION COULD GRANT A 90-DAY EXTENSION IF THERE IS PROGRESS TOWARD SUCH A SALE. IF ONE OF THOSE TWO OPTIONS DOES **NOT** HAPPEN, THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM WILL BECOME UNAVAILABLE IN THE UNITED STATES.
THIS HIGH-PROFILE CASE COULD ULTIMATELY WIND UP IN FRONT OF THE U-S SUPREME COURT, IF JUSTICES AGREE TO HEAR IT.
PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP SAID ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL THAT HE IS NOW **AGAINST** A BAN ON TIK-TOK, HAVING PREVIOUSLY BEEN IN FAVOR OF ONE.
FOR MORE UNBIASED UPDATES DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP