
Appeals court stays federal ruling, lets Calif. gun control law go into effect
By Lauren Taylor (Reporter/Producer), Zachary Hill (Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Consequat morbi pellentesque porttitor euismod nulla purus mi accumsan pharetra enim, mauris faucibus fringilla etiam tincidunt vel aenean gravida sodales potenti netus, senectus platea tristique posuere nec nibh vehicula donec sollicitudin.
- Rhoncus natoque porttitor mus vivamus lobortis velit convallis pharetra hendrerit dapibus curabitur bibendum adipiscing elit dictum, commodo a eros sociosqu mollis vel dictumst quisque facilisis justo diam feugiat litora.
- Magna tristique bibendum etiam praesent non ullamcorper nam penatibus libero, habitant elit primis varius senectus eleifend quis.
- Dictum arcu posuere tempus class montes aptent donec iaculis, ut congue pharetra ridiculus massa urna efficitur consequat, nec vestibulum nulla magnis potenti platea ultricies.
- Quisque ullamcorper eleifend ut nullam enim facilisis justo, duis primis porttitor sed varius sagittis vestibulum, urna nascetur metus finibus magnis efficitur.
- Auctor eleifend cubilia justo cras eu est rhoncus nam imperdiet at sem suscipit amet, elit vivamus aliquet ex maecenas sociosqu nulla rutrum facilisi morbi lobortis lectus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
California’s new gun control law, S.B. 2, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September, took effect on Jan. 1. The law identifies 26 “sensitive places” where carrying firearms is prohibited, even for concealed carry license holders.
Those designated places include parks, zoos, libraries, museums, banks, churches, hospitals, public gatherings, playgrounds, and stadiums, among others.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
S.B. 2 introduces stricter requirements for concealed carry permits, demanding prior firearms training, a minimum age of 21, character references and a background check. Private business owners have the authority to display signs indicating whether guns are permitted on the premises.
“We feel very strongly that these bills meet the Bruen test and they were drafted accordingly,” Newsom said the day he signed S.B. 2. “But I’m not naïve about the recklessness of the federal courts and the ideological agenda.”
Gov. Newsom asserted that the legislation aligns with the Bruen test, which was established in the 2022 Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association V. Bruen.
The California Rifle and Pistol Association contested S.B. 2 and sued to block the legislation from taking effect. U.S. District Court Judge Cormac Carney ruled against the law on Dec. 20, deeming it “sweeping, repugnant to the Second Amendment, and defiant of the Supreme Court.”
However, on Dec. 30, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay on the ruling, allowing S.B. 2 to proceed. Newsom responded, emphasizing the importance of maintaining California’s gun laws during the appeal.
This ruling will allow our common-sense gun laws to remain in place while we appeal the district court’s dangerous ruling.
— Governor Newsom (@CAgovernor) December 30, 2023
Californians overwhelmingly support efforts to ensure that places like hospitals, libraries and children’s playgrounds remain safe and free from guns. pic.twitter.com/PODiTf6YvN
The fate of S.B. 2 rests on the upcoming appeal, but currently, it stands as California law.
THE NEW YEAR BRINGS A NEW GUN CONTROL LAW TO CALIFORNIA – EVEN AFTER A FEDERAL JUDGE RULED IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL
THE STATE LAW – KNOWN AS “SENATE BILL TWO” –SIGNED BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM IN SEPTEMBER – WENT INTO EFFECT JANUARY 1ST.
THE LEGISLATION LISTS 26 “SENSITIVE PLACES” WHERE GUN OWNERS – EVEN THOSE WHO HAVE THEIR CONCEALED CARRY LICENSE – WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO CARRY A FIREARM.
SOME OF THOSE SENSITIVE PLACES INCLUDE: PARKS, ZOOS, LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS, BANKS, CHURCHES, HOSPITALS, PUBLIC GATHERINGS, PLAYGROUNDS, AND STADIUMS… JUST TO NAME A FEW.
THE LAW ALSO PUTS NEW REQUIREMENTS IN PLACE FOR THOSE SEEKING A CONCEAL CARRY PERMIT – AS APPLICANTS WOULD NEED PREVIOUS FIREARMS TRAINING, TO BE AT LEAST 21 YEARS OLD, PROVIDE CHARACTER REFERENCES, AND COMPLETE A BACKGROUND CHECK.
PRIVATE BUSINESS OWNERS ARE ALLOWED TO PUT UP SIGNS STATING IF GUNS ARE ALLOWED ON THEIR PROPERTIES.
(GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM / D – CALIFORNIA)
“WE FEEL VERY STRONGLY THAT THESE BILLS MEET THE BRUEN TEST AND THEY WERE DRAFTED ACCORDINGLY. BUT I’M NOT NAÏVE ABOUT THE RECKLESSNESS OF THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE IDEOLOGICAL AGENDA.”
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
“THE BRUEN TEST” GOVERNOR NEWSOM IS REFERRING TO –
WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2022 WITH THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION V. BRUEN – IN WHICH JUSTICES DECLARED STATE GUN LAWS MUST BE “CONSISTENT WITH THE NATION’S HISTORICAL TRADITION OF FIREARM REGULATION.”
SHORTLY AFTER NEWSOM SIGNED SB2 –
THE CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION SUED TO BLOCK THE LAW FROM TAKING EFFECT.
ON DECEMBER 20TH – U-S DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CORMAC CARNEY RULED AGAINST SB-2 ARGUING THE LAW “IS SWEEPING, REPUGNANT TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND OPENLY DEFIANT OF THE SUPREME COURT.” WRITING THE LAW “TURNS NEARLY EVERY PUBLIC PLACE IN CALIFORNIA INTO A ‘SENSITIVE PLACE,’ EFFECTIVELY ABOLISHING THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF LAW-ABIDING AND EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED CITIZENS TO BE ARMED AND TO DEFEND THEMSELVES IN PUBLIC.”
THEN ON DECEMBER 30TH – THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PUT A STAY ON THE RULING – ALLOWING THE LAW TO GO INTO EFFECT –
NEWSOM REACTED TO THE APPEALS COURT’S MOVE, SAYING:
“THIS RULING WILL ALLOW CALIFORNIA’S COMMON-SENSE GUN LAWS TO REMAIN IN PLACE WHILE WE APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT’S DANGEROUS RULING. CALIFORNIANS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT PLACES LIKE HOSPITALS, LIBRARIES, AND CHILDREN’S PLAYGROUNDS REMAIN SAFE AND FREE FROM GUNS.”
THE RULING AGAINST THE BILL WILL BE HEARD ON APPEAL, BUT FOR NOW – S-B 2 IS THE LAW OF THE LAND IN CALIFORNIA.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Facilisi vel quam nisi augue et condimentum maecenas egestas ad platea, primis erat dui eu magna lacinia odio aliquet ipsum mollis in, ornare scelerisque urna enim nunc leo donec massa aenean.
- Natoque nisl nisi aptent elementum nibh quisque finibus ad porta bibendum inceptos mattis risus orci torquent, volutpat nullam curabitur dis ante lacinia non sit cras diam molestie conubia curae.
- Congue urna mattis eu lobortis mauris rhoncus etiam ridiculus arcu, pharetra orci est tortor ornare posuere nec.
- Torquent consectetur enim potenti libero a ultricies massa pellentesque, taciti per ad tristique faucibus dignissim ex facilisi, nunc parturient et sodales mollis scelerisque montes.
- Sit rhoncus posuere taciti malesuada platea cras diam, tellus est nisi morbi tortor litora parturient, dignissim velit dapibus praesent sodales ex.
- Felis posuere accumsan diam auctor elit habitasse natoque etiam lorem mus lectus imperdiet pretium, orci elementum dictumst penatibus feugiat dis et vestibulum senectus vel nibh luctus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.