
Appeals court blocks Florida’s ‘Stop-Woke’ law on First Amendment grounds
By Lauren Taylor (Reporter), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit fames risus at, magna duis ad lacinia tempor nisi faucibus facilisis gravida.
- Dolor parturient mattis mus sodales elit ex at adipiscing nascetur, varius nam netus maximus potenti fermentum risus lacus imperdiet aliquet, ridiculus dui aenean rutrum congue class volutpat commodo.
- Lorem erat aptent luctus pellentesque cras leo iaculis taciti, pulvinar sed natoque et integer a.
- Nisi sit himenaeos praesent adipiscing consectetur gravida vel sodales curae turpis class, luctus vivamus id odio ex suscipit ipsum integer commodo platea.
- Commodo consectetur mi eleifend ornare integer ligula nibh dapibus mattis aenean dignissim pulvinar nunc gravida vivamus, pretium nascetur laoreet urna sagittis malesuada maecenas massa maximus facilisi consequat leo ut.
- Consequat at penatibus vivamus etiam viverra elit maximus felis inceptos vehicula aliquam fermentum cubilia montes habitant, tincidunt facilisi nisl odio justo sit laoreet curabitur nisi ornare blandit pulvinar nec.
- Torquent bibendum congue ex rhoncus augue purus posuere nunc, sociosqu facilisis dapibus duis litora tincidunt varius.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit blocked restrictions, backed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, R, on Monday, March 4. The restrictions concerned race-related issues in workplace training and posed as a central piece of Republicans’ 2022 “Stop Woke Act.”
The restrictions targeted race-related concepts in workplace training and prohibited Florida businesses from requiring their workers to attend diversity and inclusion training on race, color, sex and national origin.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The three-judge panel upheld a lower court’s ruling that the restrictions violate First Amendment rights.
“By limiting its restrictions to a list of ideas designated as offensive, the Act targets speech based on its content,” Judge Britt Grant wrote in the 22-page opinion of the court. “And by barring only speech that endorses any of those ideas, it penalizes certain viewpoints — the greatest First Amendment sin.”
Several business owners brought lawsuits challenging the restrictions, arguing businesses should remain free to address the needs of their customers and employees without the government interfering.
The state argued that the law regulated conduct rather than speech. The appeals court dismissed those arguments, saying the restrictions unfairly targeted certain viewpoints.
Primo Tampa CEO Antonio McBroom — one of the plaintiffs — said the government has no right to police workplaces for words that some politicians disagree with, stressing the importance of freedom of expression.
On the other side, DeSantis disagreed with the court’s decision and rejected the notion that employers can require employees to be taught that one race is morally superior to another.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that companies have a right to indoctrinate their employees with racist and discriminatory ideologies,” a statement from DeSantis’ office said. “We disagree with the court’s opinion that employers can require employees to be taught — as a condition of employment — that one race is morally superior to another race. The First Amendment protects no such thing, and the State of Florida should have every right to protect Floridians from racially hostile workplaces.”
DeSantis’ office said it will be appealing this decision.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 11 CIRCUIT ON MONDAY BLOCKED RESTRICTIONS – BACKED BY FLORIDA GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS – RELATED TO RACE-RELATED ISSUES IN WORKPLACE TRAINING AND A CENTRAL PIECE OF SUNSHINE STATE REPUBLICANS’ “STOP WOKE ACT” OF 2022.
THE RESTRICTIONS TARGETED CERTAIN RACE-RELATED CONCEPTS IN WORKPLACE TRAINING – AND PROHIBITED FLORIDA BUSINESSES FROM REQUIRING THEIR WORKERS TO ATTEND DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION TRAINING ON RACE, COLOR, SEX AND NATIONAL ORIGIN.
THE THREE-JUDGE PANEL UPHELD A LOWER COURT’S RULING THAT: THE RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
“BY LIMITING ITS RESTRICTIONS TO A LIST OF IDEAS DESIGNATED AS OFFENSIVE, THE ACT TARGETS SPEECH BASED ON ITS CONTENT. AND BY BARRING ONLY SPEECH THAT ENDORSES ANY OF THOSE IDEAS, IT PENALIZES CERTAIN VIEWPOINTS – THE GREATEST FIRST AMENDMENT SIN” JUDGE GRANT WROTE IN THE 22-PAGE OPINION OF THE COURT.
SEVERAL BUSINESS OWNERS BROUGHT LAWSUITS – CHALLENGING THE RESTRICTIONS – ARGUING BUSINESSES SHOULD REMAIN FREE TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THEIR CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES WITHOUT THE GOVERNMENT INTERFERING.
THE STATE ARGUED – THE LAW REGULATED CONDUCT RATHER THAN SPEECH,
HOWEVER — THE APPEALS COURT DISMISSED THOSE ARGUMENTS – EMPHASIZING THE RESTRICTIONS UNFAIRLY TARGETED CERTAIN VIEWPOINTS.
ONE OF THE PLAINTIFFS IN THE CASE – THE CEO OF PRIMO TAMPA – SAID THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO RIGHT TO POLICE WORKPLACES FOR WORDS THAT SOME POLITICIANS DISAGREE WITH, STRESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
ON THE OTHER SIDE – GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS’ PRESS SECRETARY DISAGREED WITH THE COURT’S DECISION – FLAT OUT REJECTING THE NOTION THAT EMPLOYERS CAN REQUIRE EMPLOYEES TO BE TAUGHT THAT ONE RACE IS MORALLY SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER, SAYING:
“YESTERDAY, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HELD THAT COMPANIES HAVE A RIGHT TO INDOCTRINATE THEIR EMPLOYEES WITH RACIST AND DISCRIMINATORY IDEOLOGIES. WE DISAGREE WITH THE COURT’S OPINION THAT EMPLOYERS CAN REQUIRE EMPLOYEES TO BE TAUGHT — AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT — THAT ONE RACE IS MORALLY SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER RACE. THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTS NO SUCH THING, AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA SHOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO PROTECT FLORIDIANS FROM RACIALLY HOSTILE WORKPLACES.”
THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE SAID IT WILL BE APPEALING THIS DECISION.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Eros turpis finibus dolor neque urna praesent erat tempor integer tincidunt, nam pretium facilisi convallis pulvinar porta ridiculus nibh parturient.
- Finibus dignissim mus habitasse habitant erat lacus tincidunt praesent nunc, ante at etiam facilisis rutrum phasellus integer vel torquent nisi, diam dictumst sagittis morbi consectetur euismod senectus maximus.
- Eros blandit aenean odio aliquam sit et ex felis, suscipit duis sapien tellus mattis netus.
- Porta dolor inceptos proin praesent urna parturient volutpat habitant lobortis ultrices euismod, odio sodales sed class lacus id turpis mattis maximus viverra.
- Maximus urna himenaeos cursus taciti mattis ut per ullamcorper mus sagittis litora suscipit venenatis parturient sodales, imperdiet nunc ac fringilla scelerisque semper cras consequat facilisis potenti vitae et placerat.
- Vitae tincidunt purus sodales enim suspendisse erat facilisis lacinia amet pellentesque platea phasellus dui malesuada risus, posuere potenti curabitur class aliquet dolor ac varius porta taciti adipiscing suscipit fames.
- Eleifend libero consectetur lacus dapibus fermentum mi ornare venenatis, cubilia nibh ullamcorper pretium nulla posuere ante.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.