Skip to main content
Politics

After backlash, Rep. Porter regrets calling California primary ‘rigged’

This report was created with support from enhanced software.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 36% Center 45% Right 18%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., expressed regret for calling the recent California Senate primary “rigged” after losing to Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Republican Steve Garvey, a former professional baseball player, according to The Hill. Porter’s initial comments after her primary loss reportedly sparked backlash and criticism within her own party.

In early March, Porter wrote on X that she faced an “onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election.” Her remarks drew comparisons to former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about election integrity.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Trump has repeatedly called the 2020 presidential election “rigged” and alleged fraud. The GOP front-runner has also positioned himself as an “anti-establishment” candidate.

Porter said in a post on X that her supporters had the “establishment running scared.”

In an interview on the “Pod Save America” podcast, Porter clarified that she did not intend to impugn state election officials but rather highlight the influence of big money in politics. She admitted that using the term “rigged” was a mistake and emphasized the role of money in influencing elections.

While some experts acknowledge the impact of big money in politics, they caution against equating it with election rigging.

The California Senate primary employs a top-two system. Schiff’s campaign utilized TV ads to contrast him with Garvey, aiming to secure an easier path to the general election by matching him up with a Republican.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[LAUREN TAYLOR]

AFTER LOSING THE CALIFORNIA SENATE PRIMARY TO REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF AND FORMER MAJOR LEAGUER STEVE GARVEY, PROGRESSIVE REPRESENTATIVE KATIE PORTER IS REGRETTING HER CHOICE OF WORDS. PORTER HAD CALLED THE RACE “RIGGED,” SPARKING BACKLASH AND CRITICISM FROM HER OWN PARTY.

EARLIER THIS MONTH, PORTER WROTE ON X THAT SHE FACED AN “ONSLAUGHT OF BILLIONAIRES SPENDING MILLIONS TO RIG THIS ELECTION.” SHE ADDED, “BECAUSE OF YOU WE HAD THE ESTABLISHMENT RUNNING SCARED.”

PORTER’S CHARACTERIZATIONS WERE LIKENED TO THOSE OF FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP.

TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY CALLED THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION “RIGGED,” AND CLAIMED ELECTION FRAUD, WHILE POSITIONING HIMSELF AS AN “ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT” CANDIDATE.

IN AN INTERVIEW ON THE “POD SAVE AMERICA” PODCAST AFTER THE BACKLASH, PORTER SAID SHE DIDN’T MEAN MEAN TO IMPLY STATE ELECTION OFFICIALS WERE CROOKED. RATHER SHE MEANT TO HIGHLIGHT THE INFLUENCE OF BIG MONEY IN POLITICS, SAYING SHE WISHES SHE WOULD HAVE CHOSEN A DIFFERENT WORD OTHER THAN “RIGGED.”

STILL, PORTER SAID “BIG MONEY DOES INFLUENCE OUR ELECTIONS.”

SHE FURTHER CLAIMED “OUTCOMES ARE MANIPULATED AND DISTORTED” — BY LAST-MINUTE SPENDING THAT IS NOT DISCLOSED UNTIL AFTER THE VOTES ARE IN.

PORTER’S CRITIQUE OF MONEY IN POLITICS IS SIMILAR TO OTHER PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES IN CONGRESS, WHO HAVE DISAVOWED CORPORATE DONATIONS.

HOWEVER, WHILE EXPERTS NOTE BIG MONEY PLAYS A ROLE IN ELECTIONs, THEY SAY IT DOES NOT EQUATE TO RIGGING.

THE CALIFORNIA SENATE PRIMARY, WHICH USES A TOP-TWO SYSTEM, SAW PORTER FINISH IN THIRD-PLACE BEHIND SCHIFF AND REPUBLICAN STEVE GARVEY. SCHIFF’S CAMPAIGN FEATURED TV ADS TO CONTRAST HIM WITH GARVEY, IN HOPES OF RAISING SUPPORT FOR THE REPUBLICAN AMONG REPUBLICANS AND CREATING AN EASIER PATH TO THE GENERAL ELECTION.